Counter Discourse in Shakespeare’s Hamlet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70036/cltls.v1i3.40Keywords:
Counter Discourse, Shakespeare, Hamlet, PostcolonialismAbstract
General Background: Counter-discourse serves as a vital mechanism for marginalized and oppressed groups to challenge dominant narratives that often marginalize alternative perspectives. Specific Background: The concept of counter-discourse has been explored in various contexts, yet its application to classic literature, such as Shakespeare’s "Hamlet," remains underrepresented. Knowledge Gap: To date, no comprehensive studies have applied the lens of counter-discourse to "Hamlet" within a postcolonial framework. Aims: This study aims to bridge this gap by examining how "Hamlet" can be understood through the concept of counter-discourse, particularly within the realm of postcolonial theory. Results: The analysis reveals that Hamlet, as a character, engages in counter-discourse to challenge the dominant narrative represented by Claudius. Motivated by the murder of his father, Hamlet seeks to expose Claudius and invert the power dynamics through strategic counter-speech. Novelty: This paper is pioneering in its application of counter-discourse to "Hamlet," offering a novel interpretation that situates the play within postcolonial critique. Implications: The findings highlight the potential of classical texts to be reinterpreted through contemporary theoretical frameworks, thereby enriching our understanding of both the texts themselves and the theories applied. This study not only underscores the relevance of counter-discourse in literature but also opens avenues for further research in the intersection of literary analysis and postcolonial studies.
Highlights:
- Classics Reinterpreted: Postcolonial theory applied to "Hamlet" reveals new insights.
- Hamlet's Counter-discourse: Analyzes Hamlet's speeches against Claudius.
- Novel Contribution: First study to explore "Hamlet" using counter-discourse.
References
Abrahamsen, R. (2007). Postcolonialism. In International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 121-132). Routledge.
Arnold, N. W., & McMahon, B. (2019). Educational Leadership: Counter-Discourse and Resistance. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(1), 1-5.
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2013). Post-colonial studies: The key concepts. Routledge.
Burney, S. (2012). Resistance and Counter-Discourse: Writing Back to the Empire. In Counterpoints (Vol. 417, pp. 105-116).
Chen, X. (2002). Occidentalism: A Theory of Counter-Discourse in Post-Mao China. Rowman & Littlefield.
Ciobanu, E. (2010). ‘A Little More Than Kin and Less Than Kind’: Word-Ghosts and Ghost-Words in Hamlet. Interstudia (Revista Centrului Interdisciplinar de Studiu al Formelor Discursive Contemporane Interstud), 6, 109-116.
Durmus, H. E. (2020). Discourses on Hamlet’s Journey in Turkey. TranscUlturAl, 12, 120-139.
Enache, D. T. (2020). To "Hamlet" or Not to "Hamlet": Notes on an Arts Secondary School Students’ "Hamlet". Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance, 21(1), 153-172.
Goron, A. (2000) Counter-Discourse and Language of Resilience by Young People Against Boko Haram in the Far-North Region of Cameroon. RASI, 67.
Johnston, B. (1994). The Dangerous Seductions of the Past: Ibsen's Counter-Discourse to Modernity. Modern Drama, 37(4), 651-664.
Jazeel, T. (2019). Postcolonialism. Routledge.
Löschigg, M. (2013). Shakespeare’s Post-Colonial Legacy: The Case of Othello. Anglia, 131(1), 17-34.
McEwan, C. (2008). Postcolonialism and Development. Routledge.
Mishra, V., & Hodge, B. (2005). What Was Postcolonialism?. New Literary History, 36(3), 375-402.
Morales-Díaz, E. (2002). ‘Farewell, Master, Farewell’: Counter-Discourse in Reinaldo Arenas' Writing. State University of New York at Albany.
Rizvi, F. (2007). Postcolonialism and Globalization in Education. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 7(3), 256-263.
Schaffeld, N. (2019). A Fictionalized Representation of Scientific Counter-Discourse: Jo Lendle's Historical Science Novel Alles Land (2011). The German Quarterly, 92(1), 35-50.
Shakespeare, W. (1703). The tragedy of Hamlet, prince of Denmark. Wellington.
Slemon, S. (1987). Monuments of Empire: Allegory/Counter-Discourse/Post-Colonial Writing. Kunapipi, 9(3), 3.
Terdiman, R. (1985). Discourse/counter-discourse: The theory and practice of symbolic resistance in nineteenth-century France. Cornell University Press.
Thosago, C. (1998). A Postcolonial Reading of Colonial Strategies in Shakespeare's Plays. Journal of Literary Studies, 14(1-2), 194-212.
Tiffin, H. M. (1989). Rites of Resistance: Counter-Discourse and West Indian Biography. Journal of West Indian Literature, 3(1), 28-46.
Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide. Routledge.
Vasilescu, C. (2022). Fearful Symmetry: Shakespeare’s Dramatis Personae in Hamlet. Advances in Literary Study, 10(4), 321-328.
Wardaningsih, A. D., & Kasih, E. N. E. W. (2022). Counter Discourse of Masculinity in Avenger: Endgame Movie. J. Arts Educ, 2(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yaseen Hussein Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Comparative Linguistics, Translation and Literary Studies agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
License
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0
