Discourse Markers Closing Conversations in American TV Series: A Pragma-conversational Analysis

Authors

  • Abdullah Muhammad Naif Tikrit University, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70036/cltls.v2i4.240

Keywords:

Discourse markers, Closing Strategies and Techniques, Pragma-conversational analysis

Abstract

Background: Discourse markers (DMs) are essential linguistic expressions used to structure discourse and manage interpersonal relationships during conversations. Their role in closing conversations, particularly in maintaining politeness and smooth interaction, has been underexplored, especially in the context of American TV series. Aims: This study aims to investigate the use of discourse markers in closing conversations in American TV series. Specifically, it examines the types of DMs used by American speakers to end conversations politely, focusing on their connection to closing strategies, such as making positive comments, offering excuses, and suggesting future interaction. The study also seeks to develop a model for analyzing these markers within pragma-conversational analysis. Methods: The research adopts a pragma-conversational analysis framework to examine the use of DMs in closing conversations. The study analyzes twenty conversations randomly selected from the first season of the American TV series Firefly Lane. The data is categorized into implicit and explicit DMs, and the relationships between these markers and closing strategies are explored. Result: The study finds that implicit DMs, such as “thank you,” “anyway,” and “great,” are associated with positive politeness strategies, while explicit DMs, such as “goodbye” and “bye,” are linked to negative politeness. The research also highlights the dominance of implicit markers in maintaining the smooth flow of conversation, especially in formal contexts. Implication: his study contributes to our understanding of the pragmatics of conversation closure, showing how discourse markers facilitate polite interactions. The findings suggest that the appropriate use of DMs enhances relational harmony in both media discourse and everyday communication. The research also provides insights into how media representations of conversation reflect broader social norms related to politeness and interaction.

References

Antaki, C. (2008). Discourse analysis and conversation analysis. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods (pp. 431–446). Sage.

Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse function. Mouton de Gruyter.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Cook, G. (2004). Discourse. Oxford University Press.

Coppock, L. (2017). Politeness strategies in conversation closings. Unpublished manuscript. http://www.stanford.edu/~coppock/face.pdf

Cutting, J. (2008). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). Routledge.

De Janasz, S., Dowd, K., & Schneider, B. (2009). Interpersonal skills in organizations (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Eisenberg, E. M., Goodall, H. L., Jr., & Trethewey, A. (2021). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Fine, D. (2005). The fine art of small talk: How to start a conversation, keep it going, build networking skills—and leave a positive impression. Hyperion.

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5

Fraser, B. (2011). The sequencing of contrastive discourse markers in English. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 1, 29–35.

Fu, Y., Afzaal, M., & El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2024). Investigating discourse markers 'you know' and 'I mean' in mediatized English political interviews: A corpus-based comparative study. Frontiers in Communication, 9, Article 1427062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1427062

Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Maschler, Y. (2009). Metalanguage in interaction: Hebrew discourse markers. John Benjamins.

Reed, B. S. (2012). Analyzing conversation. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ruiz-Garrido, M. F., Palmer-Silveira, J. C., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2010). English for professional and academic purposes. Rodopi.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.

Schourup, L. (1982). Common discourse particles in English conversation (Unpublished dissertation, Ohio State University).

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.

Swan, M. (2005). Practical English usage (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Verdonik, D. (2022). Discourse markers and dialogue act annotation for computational dialogue systems. In M. Cuenca & L. Degand (Eds.), Discourse markers in interaction: From production to comprehension (pp. 191–214). De Gruyter Mouton.

Wood, J. T. (2015). Interpersonal communication: Everyday encounters (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-11

How to Cite

Naif, A. M. (2025). Discourse Markers Closing Conversations in American TV Series: A Pragma-conversational Analysis. Comparative Linguistics Translation and Literary Studies, 2(4), 240. https://doi.org/10.70036/cltls.v2i4.240

Citation Check