Universal Linguistic Economy Streamlines Global Communication

Authors

  • Rasulov Zubaydullo Izomovich Bukhara State University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70036/cltls.v1i3.32

Keywords:

Linguistic Economy, Information Structuring, Comparative Analysis, Intonation, Morphological Markers

Abstract

This study explores the principle of economy in language, investigating how various linguistic tools such as word order, intonation, and morphological markers affect the structuring of information across different languages. Through comparative analysis, it reveals that despite the diversity in linguistic mechanisms, all languages employ these tools influenced by the economic principle to streamline communication. This finding has significant implications for understanding linguistic evolution and enhancing communication strategies in a global context.

Highlights:

  • All languages utilize mechanisms like word order, intonation, and morphology to streamline communication, demonstrating the universal influence of the principle of economy.
  • The comparative analysis of diverse languages provides insights into how different linguistic tools are employed to manage and express information efficiently.
  • Understanding these mechanisms can enhance global communication strategies and contribute to theories of linguistic evolution and processing.

Keywords: Linguistic Economy, Information Structuring, Comparative Analysis, Intonation, Morphological Markers 

References

Frey, A. (2006). Grammar of Errors (p. 108). Moscow, Russia: KomKniga.

Gossotsekonomizdat (1936). Ancient Theories of Language and Style (p. 180). Moscow, Russia: Gossotsekonomizdat.

Ingve, V. (1965). Depth Hypothesis. In New in Linguistics (Vol. 4, p. 132). Moscow, Russia: Progress.

Izomovich, R. Z., & Fazliddinovna, U. D. (2022). Implications From Syntax for Teaching a Second Language. In Integration of Pragmalinguistics, Functional Translation Studies and Language Teaching Processes (pp. 320-323).

Izomovich, R. Z., & Fazliddinovna, U. D. (2021). The Problems of Second Language Acquisition and Writing in Teaching English Language. In Online Conferences Platform (pp. 229-233).

Kashgari, M. (1960). Dictionary of Turkish Words (Devoni Lugatit Turk) (Vol. 1, p. 69). Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Science.

Mahmudov, N. (2017). Linguistic Studies (p. 176). Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Mumtoz Soz.

Potebnya, A. A. (1968). From Notes on Russian Grammar (Vol. 3, p. 551). Moscow, Russia: Education.

Rasulov, Z. I. (2017). Features of Positional Typological and Linguistic Place of Cultural Studies. Ilmiymak. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=BMFYYzIAAAAJ

Rasulov, Z. I. (2010). Principle of English Language Material 94.

Rasulov, Z. I., & Saidov, K. S. (2022). Linguistic Economy as an Inseparable Law of Language Evolution. In Integration of Pragmalinguistics, Functional Translation Studies and Language Teaching Processes (pp. 8-12).

Rasulov, Z. (2022). Information Forming Tools (Factors) in the Structure of Discourse. Center for Scientific Publications (Vol. 15, Issue 15). Retrieved from https://journal.buxdu.uz/index.php/journals_buxdu/article/view/6981.

Safarov, S. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics (p. 54). Jizzakh, Uzbekistan: Sangzor.

Shermatov, E. N. (2006). Superconductivity and Human Memory (p. 172). St. Petersburg, Russia: Polytechnic University Publishing House.

Spencer, G. (1986). Basic Principles (p. 172). Kiev, Ukraine: Vishcha School.

Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. (1996). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics (p. 66). Edinburgh, UK: Longman.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Izomovich, R. Z. (2024). Universal Linguistic Economy Streamlines Global Communication. Comparative Linguistics, Translation, and Literary Studies, 1(3), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.70036/cltls.v1i3.32

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.